United States v. Juan Camacho-Amador

Good Law
588 F. App'x 643
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 201414-50030California150 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Juan Camacho-Amador appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 68-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Camacho-Amador contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because he is a young, first-time offender who committed the offense to support his family. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Camacho-Ama-dor’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence 120 months below the bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors. See id.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.