Marschke

Marschke v. Sacramento County Civil Service Commission CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2014C072579California2,367 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/16/14 Marschke v. Sacramento County Civil Service Commission CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

STEVEN MARSCHKE, as Successor in Interest C072579 etc., (Super. Ct. No. Plaintiff and Appellant, 34201080000559CUWMGDS)

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE

COMMISSION,

Defendant;

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

The sole question of law presented in this appeal is whether an employee who delayed her start date with the County of Sacramento to accommodate her personal vacation began her six-month probationary period when she signed the paperwork before she left on vacation or when she first reported to work. Appellant argues that under the relevant county ordinances and civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.