Davis

Davis v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2014E058912California4,771 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/16/14 Davis v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DANA L. DAVIS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E058912

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1211508)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Paulette Durand Barkley,

Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, §21.) Affirmed.

Law Offices of Thomas Gillen, and Thomas W. Gillen for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Severson & Werson, Jan T. Chilton, Navdeep K. Singh, and Kerry W. Franich for

Defendant and Respondent.

1 In 2005, Plaintiff and Appellant Dana Davis obtained a loan from Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.