Sande

Sande v. DMV CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2014A140071California2,212 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/16/14 Sande v. DMV CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

HARVEY SANDE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A140071

v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG13674592) Defendant and Respondent.

Harvey Sande (appellant), in pro per, challenges the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate and upholding the Department of Motor Vehicles’ (DMV) withdrawal of his driver’s license. He contends: (1) there was no substantial evidence to support the decision; (2) the trial court erred in denying his request for a jury trial; and (3) the trial court erred in admitting evidence pertaining to his conservatorship and medical records associated with the conservatorship. We reject the contentions and affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.