Friedman

Friedman v. Regents CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 2014B245406California7,755 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/17/14 Friedman v. Regents CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JAMES FRIEDMAN, B245406 c/w B259167

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC445059) v.

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY

OF CALIFORNIA et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mel Red Recana, Judge. Judgment in favor of the Regents is affirmed. Judgment in favor of Horak and Qedwai is reversed with directions. Savarese Law Firm and Melanie Rasic Savarese; Steven B. Stevens for Plaintiff and Appellant. Reed Smith, Paul D. Fogel, Dennis Peter Maio and Ilana R. Herscovitz; Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo and Irma Rodriguez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.