United States v. Yoan Borjorquez

Good Law
588 F. App'x 660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 201414-30020California242 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yoan Campos Borjorquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Borjorquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Borjorquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Borjorquez’s conviction. We accordingly affirm Borjorquez’s conviction.

Borjorquez waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the sentencing waiver, we dismiss Borjor-quez’s appeal as to his sentence. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).

We remand to the district court with instructions to correct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.