Stephens

Lennar Homes of California, Inc. v. Stephens

Good Law
181 Cal. Rptr. 3d 638·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1160·232 Cal. App. 4th 673
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2014E057280California8,139 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

Defendants and respondents Stella Stephens, Timothy Young, and Melissa Young purchased homes from plaintiff and appellant Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (Lennar). The agreements between Lennar and Stephens and between Lennar and the Youngs contain identical indemnity clauses. In this lawsuit, Lennar attempts to enforce those indemnity clauses, seeking to recover attorney fees and costs incurred in defending a class action lawsuit, brought initially by Stephens, and later joined by Timothy Young — ■ but not Melissa Young — in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Lennar appeals the trial court’s order granting defendants’ special motion to strike the complaint as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (anti-SLAPP motion) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP statute). Lennar challenges the trial court’s ruling that the indemnity clause at issue is unenforceable under California law, precluding Lennar from demonstrating a probability of success on the merits. Lennar also disagrees with the trial court’s finding that Lennar’s claim against Melissa Young arises from activity protected under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.