Smith v. Ricca CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2014H039253MCalifornia14,633 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Filed 12/18/14 Smith v. Ricca CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DELMAN SMITH, et al., H039253 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. 112CV228357)

v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

MARIA RICCA, et al.,

NO CHANGE IN THE JUDGMENT

Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT:

The court on its own motion orders that the opinion filed November 25, 2014, be modified as follows: A. On page 2, third full paragraph, third sentence, after “. . . dissolution case” and before “(forged declaration theory)” add: “, and that Smith negligently failed to supervise Newsom in her signing Ricca’s name to court-filed documents” B. On pages 2-3, third full paragraph,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.