Prof. Collection Consultants v. Lauron CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2014H039718California4,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 12/18/14 Prof. Collection Consultants v. Lauron CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PROFESSIONAL COLLECTION H039718

CONSULTANTS, (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 111CV213127) Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Appellant,

v.

KRYSTAL LAURON,

Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Respondent;

TODD ALLEN SHIELDS et al.,

Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Professional Collection Consultants (PCC) brought a lawsuit in November 2011 against Krystal Lauron to collect a $10,000 debt allegedly owing. Todd Shields, PCC’s vice president, verified the complaint. The debt had been assigned from a lending institution to Wireless Receivables Acquisition Group (WRAG), which, in turn, assigned it to PCC. Over a year…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.