Strauss

Strauss v. Aerojet Rocketdyne CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2014B247439California5,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/18/14 Strauss v. Aerojet Rocketdyne CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MARY STRAUSS, B247439

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC469152) v.

AEROJET ROCKETDYNE OF DE, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Malcolm H. Mackey, Judge. Reversed in part and affirmed in part. Golan Law, PC and Jeremy M. Golan; Bent Caryl & Kroll, LLP and Steven M. Kroll for Plaintiff and Appellant. Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Timothy L. Hix and John T. Anthony III for Defendant and Respondent.

_________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Paul Strauss (Strauss) appeals a judgment following a grant of summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.