Reimche

Reimche v. Church CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2014F068384California6,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/18/14 Reimche v. Church CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

LUCY REIMCHE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

F068384

v. (Super. Ct. No. 12CECG00719) JOHN CHURCH et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Kristi Culver Kapetan, Judge. Sagaser, Watkins & Wieland, Howard A. Sagaser and Ian B. Wieland for Defendants and Appellants. The Law Offices of Gregory J. Smith, Gregory J. Smith; Campagne, Campagne & Lerner, Justin T. Campagne and Wiley R. Driskill for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Defendants appeal from an order disqualifying their attorney, his associated cocounsel, and the law firms of both attorneys from representing defendants in this litigation. The disqualification was based on the associated cocounsel’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.