Maxwell

Maxwell v. Phares CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 2014D064849California3,669 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/19/14 Maxwell v. Phares CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS MAXWELL, D064849

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 37-2012-00052464-

CU-BC-NC & 37-2013-00029711-

DAVID PHARES et al., CU-BC-NC)

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H.

Mass III, Judge. Affirmed.

Wingert Grebing Brubaker & Juskie, Stephen C. Grebing, Amy L. Simonson and

Andrew B. Kleiner for Defendants and Appellants.

Freeland McKinely & McKinley, Karen G. McKinley and Steven A. McKinley for

Plaintiff and Respondent. Defendants and appellants Bruce Keeton, David Phares, and Keeton…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.