Sohmer

Sohmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2014E056316California3,656 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/22/14 Sohmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MARK SOHMER,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E056316

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1112326)

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Daniel A. Ottolia and

John W. Vineyard, Judges. Affirmed.

Mark Sohmer, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Alvarado Smith APC and Mikel A. Glavinovich for Defendants and Respondents

J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, and California

Reconveyance Company.

1 On March 19, 2012, the trial court sustained defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.