Sohmer
Sohmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 12/22/14 Sohmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
MARK SOHMER,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E056316
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1112326)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., OPINION
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Daniel A. Ottolia and
John W. Vineyard, Judges. Affirmed.
Mark Sohmer, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Alvarado Smith APC and Mikel A. Glavinovich for Defendants and Respondents
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, and California
Reconveyance Company.
1 On March 19, 2012, the trial court sustained defendant’s…