Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mademoiselle Of California

Good Law
379 F.2d 660·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6112
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 196721375California3,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

379 F.2d 660 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of San Francisco National Bank, Appellant, v. MADEMOISELLE OF CALIFORNIA, a Co-Partnership, Edward Wieger and Ruth Carlson, Individually and as Co-Partners doing business under the firm name and style of Mademoiselle of California, Nancy Wieger, Wendell R. Carlson, and Union Bank, a Corporation, Appellees. No. 21375. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 6, 1967. Charles A. Legge, Alan I. Kaplan, Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, San Francisco, Cal., John F. Lee, Leslie H. Fisher, FDIC, Washington, D.C., for appellant. LeRoy Hersh, Hersh & Hadfield, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee, Mademoiselle of Calif. and others. William T. Doyle, Doyle & Clecak, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee, Union Bank. Before JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District judge. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge: 1 This is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of appellees, Mademoiselle of California (hereinafter Mademoiselle) and Union Bank (hereinafter Union). Appellant, as receiver of San Francisco National Bank (hereinafter SFNB), brought this declaratory judgment action to determine 1) whether Mademoiselle is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.