Barton

Barton v. RPost International CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 2014B251722MCalifornia8,475 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

Filed 12/24/14 Barton v. RPost International CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

KENNETH BARTON, B251722

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YC061581) v.

RPOST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED et ORDER MODIFYING OPINION al., [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

Defendants and Appellants.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 9, 2014, be modified in the following particulars: On page 19, the first sentence of the second paragraph reads: “In this case, defendants’ expert Henry concluded the value of Barton’s common shares at the time of conversion was zero, while Barton’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.