People v. Pimentel CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 2014A138935California4,515 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 12/24/14 P. v. Pimentel CA1/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A138935

ROSALIO PIMENTEL,

(San Mateo County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. SC076531A)

In re ROSALIO PIMENTEL,

A142492

on Habeas Corpus.

This is a consolidated direct appeal from judgment and petition for writ of habeas corpus (habeas corpus petition) brought by defendant Rosalio Pimentel. The issues raised on direct appeal and by way of the habeas corpus petition are essentially the same, and thus may be considered collectively: Was defendant effectively abandoned by his attorney during trial when she: (1) failed to object to admission of certain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.