Palmer v. Patel CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2014H039336California7,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/30/14 Palmer v. Patel CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

WILLIAM W. PALMER et al., H039336 (Santa Cruz County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. CV168214)

v.

CHANDRAVALLI PATEL et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

William W. Palmer and Joanne L. Palmer (Palmers) appeal from the postjudgment order granting a motion for attorney fees and costs against them. They challenge the award of attorney fees under Civil Code section 17171 on multiple grounds. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm. I Procedural History The Palmers’ first amended complaint (hereinafter “the complaint”) alleged seven causes of action: (1) declaratory relief, (2) breach of contract, (3) breach of implied covenant of good faith and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.