Montgomery v. Klinedinst CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 2014D063946California2,585 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

Filed 12/31/14 Montgomery v. Klinedinst CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD MONTGOMERY et al., D063946

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00086633-

CU-NP-CTL)

KLINEDINST PC,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

William S. Dato, Judge. Affirmed.

Daniel S. Agle for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Friedberg & Bunge, Thomas F. Friedberg and Brittany D.

Botterill for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Klinedinst PC (Klinedinst) appeals from an order denying its special motion to

strike Richard Montgomery's and Francis Quirino's (together, Plaintiffs) complaint.

Klinedinst brought the motion under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.