People v. Hunt CA4/1

DISCUSSION

There are no relevant facts to discuss in this appeal. Appellate counsel presents no

argument for reversal of the trial court's order, but asks this court to review the record for

error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and Anders v.

California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), raising this possible but not arguable appellate

issue: "Whether the trial court erred by finding that the one-year prior prison

enhancement would be added to the sentence full strength at the end of the sentence even

if it had made the case it was attached to the subordinate term instead of finding that it

should be reduced to one-third the mid term if it had made the case it was attached to the

subordinate term."

We offered Hunt the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal and he not has

done so.

2 We have reviewed the entire record in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d

436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, and have not found any arguable appellate issue.

Competent counsel has represented Hunt on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

O'ROURKE, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

McINTYRE, J.

3