MacQuiddy

MacQuiddy v. Mercedes-Benz USA CA2/8

Good Law
182 Cal. Rptr. 3d 691·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 79·233 Cal. App. 4th 1036
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 2015B251752California6,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bigelow, J.

— After experiencing problems with his Mercedes-Benz that required multiple repair attempts, plaintiff Rand MacQuiddy filed suit against defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (Mercedes-Benz), under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.; the Act) and the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 2301 ). MacQuiddy sought a refund for the car and a civil penalty for the alleged willful violation of the Act. In its answer to the complaint, Mercedes-Benz admitted it had not been able to conform the car to the applicable warranties within the timeframes set forth in the Act. Mercedes-Benz also admitted it had not yet replaced the car or made restitution, but asserted it would offer to reimburse MacQuiddy as required under the Act. MacQuiddy subsequently rejected a statutory offer to compromise in which Mercedes-Benz offered to repurchase the car for an amount consistent with the Act, and to pay MacQuiddy’s attorney fees and costs incurred up to that point. Because Mercedes-Benz admitted liability for failure to repurchase or replace the car under the Act, and the parties stipulated to a restitution amount,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.