Manner

Manner v. Intevac CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 2015H038979California8,541 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mihara, J.

Filed 1/2/15 Manner v. Intevac CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DAVID MANNER, H038979

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. CV188274)

v.

INTEVAC, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff David Manner brought an action for, among other things, retaliation in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12940), retaliation in violation of public policy, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, failure to investigate (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (k)), intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of Labor Code section 1174, subdivision (d), and unfair competition (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200) after defendants Intevac, Inc., Intevac…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.