Aparicio

People v. Aparicio

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2015D064995ACalifornia3,162 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

DISCUSSION

I. General Legal Principles

"On November 6, 2012, voters approved Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform

Act of 2012 (the Act)." (People v. Superior Court (Kaulick) (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th

1279, 1285 (Kaulick).) The Act provides a means whereby prisoners currently serving

sentences of 25 years to life for a third felony conviction, which was not a serious or

violent felony, may seek court review of their indeterminate sentences and, under certain

circumstances, obtain resentencing as if they had only one prior serious or violent felony

conviction and was thus a second-strike, rather than a third-strike, offender. (Id. at p.

1286.)

If the inmate satisfies the statutory criteria and is eligible for resentencing

(§ 1170.126, subds. (e), (f)), the trial court "shall" resentence the inmate "unless the court,

in its discretion, determines that resentencing the petitioner would pose an unreasonable

risk of danger to public safety." (§ 1170.126, subd. (f).) "In exercising its discretion in

subdivision (f), the court may consider: [¶] (1) The petitioner's criminal conviction history,

including the type of crimes committed, the extent of injury to victims,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.