Mecchi
Mecchi v. Hallquist CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/5/15 Mecchi v. Hallquist CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Tehama) ----
LEAH MECCHI, C074900
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CI67665)
v.
TODD ROBERT HALLQUIST,
Defendant and Appellant.
Todd Robert Hallquist appeals the trial court’s civil harassment restraining order enjoining him from coming within 500 feet of certain real property and within 25 yards of certain protected persons. He contends the court abused its discretion in denying his motion to continue the trial to permit him to find substitute counsel, and that the error was prejudicial because it denied Hallquist a fair hearing. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the judgment.