Rahnama

Rahnama v. Rahnama CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2015F066985California484 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/5/15 Rahnama v. Rahnama CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MADJID RAHNAMA,

F066985

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F011CECG02827) v.

DAVOOD RAHNAMA et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Carlos A. Cabrera, Judge. Davood Rahnama, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Debbie Renna, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Madjid Rahnama, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Levy, Acting P.J., Cornell, J. and Kane, J. Respondent Madjid Rahnama, and appellants, Davood Rahnama and Debbie Renna, are in the used car business. Madjid and Davood1 are brothers and Renna is Davood’s domestic companion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.