Zulli

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

We have previously set forth the facts of this ongoing dispute between the parties and do so only briefly here.2 Appellant sued respondents and other defendants over the nonjudicial foreclosure on his now-deceased mother's residence.3 The trial court dismissed the action after sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend, and we dismissed appellant's appeals as untimely. Appellant then filed the instant suits. The trial court dismissed MERS from the action after sustaining its demurrer to the first amended complaint, and we affirmed. (Zulli v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., supra.) The trial court subsequently dismissed Wells Fargo and Litton from the action after sustaining their demurrer to the third amended complaint without leave to amend, and we affirmed. (Zulli v. Litton Loan Servicing LP, supra.) Appellant then filed a third case against respondents involving the nonjudicial foreclosure. In addition, he attempted to add respondents back into the instant case as unnamed "Doe" defendants. Meanwhile, the subject property was sold at a foreclosure sale. When appellant failed to vacate the premises, Wells Fargo filed an…