Wendy Road Storage v. Teleflex CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 2015B251133California4,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/6/15 Wendy Road Storage v. Teleflex CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

WENDY ROAD STORAGE, LLC, 2d Civil No. B251133 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2010-00379340- Cross-complainant and Respondent. CU-BC-SIM) (Ventura County) v.

TELEFLEX INCORPORATED,

Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Teleflex Incorporated (Teleflex) appeals a judgment after jury verdict in favor of Wendy Road Storage, LLC (Wendy Road) on a cross-complaint for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Teleflex contends substantial evidence does not support the verdict because Teleflex was not a stranger to the economic relationship with which it allegedly interfered; the jury would not have found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.