Marriage of Shokoohy and Rahgoshay CA4/3

FACTS

In these acrid proceedings between appellant and his ex-wife, Fariba Shokoohy (respondent), the parties dispute, among other things, whether respondent should pay appellant spousal and child support and, if so, how much. Respondent, a medical doctor, claims appellant has been misrepresenting for decades that he is disabled. She says he is perfectly healthy and has been fraudulently collecting Social Security disability income while working in construction, real estate, and property management. Appellant claims, inter alia, that respondent misrepresented her income to the court before it entered judgment on reserved issues. After judgment was entered awarding him no spousal support, appellant filed a motion to set aside the judgment. When the set aside motion was denied, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration. While the motion for reconsideration was pending, appellant filed an appeal from the order denying the set aside motion. The appeal was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. Ultimately, the court denied the motion for reconsideration. Appellant then filed the instant appeal, from the order denying his motion for reconsideration. We issued an order…