Donahue Schriber Realty Group v. Nu Creation Outreach

DISCUSSION

I. Appeal by Nu Creation Outreach

The complaint named as defendants Daniel and Nu Creation Outreach; it alleged the solicitation of donations was conducted by solicitors from Nu Creation Outreach. The papers and brief purportedly filed on behalf of defendants in the trial court and in this appeal were filed by Daniel in propria persona. Daniel purports to appear on behalf of himself and Nu Creation Outreach. One of his arguments on appeal is that Nu Creation Outreach was not the correct entity to name as a defendant in the complaint. He asserts Nu Creation Outreach runs youth centers and food pantries outside of Fresno County and the solicitors on plaintiff’s property were not there as agents of Nu Creation Outreach. In an amended opposition to the OSC, filed in the trial court purportedly on behalf of Nu Creation Outreach, Daniel asserted Nu Creation Outreach is a corporation and he is not its owner, though he is a member of its board of directors and its treasurer. Daniel stated he leads a coalition called “Nu Creations” or “Nu Creations Free Speech Coalition,” and it was the members of this coalition who were soliciting donations at Fig Garden Village. He asks…