National Labor Relations Board v. Transmarine Navigation Corporation and Its Subsidiary, International Terminals, Inc.

Good Law
380 F.2d 933·65 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2861·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 196720964California3,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peckham, J.

The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter “Board”) has petitioned this Court for enforcement of its order issued against Respondent on May 28, 1965, following proceedings under Section 10 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act (hereinafter “Act”) as amended ( 61 Stat. 136 , 73 Stat. 519 , 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.). The Board’s decision and order are reported at 152 N.L.R.B. 998 . This Court has jurisdiction over the proceedings under section 10(e) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e), since the alleged unfair labor practices occurred at Los Angeles, California, within this judicial circuit.

Respondent Transmarine Navigation Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, International Terminals, Inc., (hereinafter “Company”), operated as a freight agent, ship broker, steamship agent, and terminal operator at Wilmington in the Los Angeles Harbor. In February, 1960, the American Federation of Guards, Local #1 (hereinafter “Union”) was certified by the Board as the collective bargaining representative of the guard unit whose members were employed by the Company to protect -cargo on the ships and in the warehouses on the dock. Since that time a collective bargaining agreement has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.