Hernandez

Hernandez v. W.R. Thomas CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2015D064036California9,430 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 1/8/15 Hernandez v. W.R. Thomas CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

WENDY HERNANDEZ et al., D064036

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. ECU06984)

W.R. THOMAS, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Imperial County, Jeffrey B.

Jones, Judge. Affirmed.

The Hanson Law Firm, John W. Hanson and Elisa M. Swanson, for Plaintiffs and

Appellants.

Flynn & Flynn and Gregory E. Flynn; Stephen M. Hogan, for Defendants and

Respondents. Wendy Hernandez and her mother, Sandra Hernandez, bought a used car from

Direct Auto Plaza.1 Less than one year later, they sued Direct Auto asserting contract,

tort, and statutory claims arising from the sale. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.