Lane

Lane v. Bell CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2015D064651California5,678 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcdonald, J.

Filed 1/8/15 Lane v. Bell CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN LANE et al., D064651

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00034878-CU-MC-CTL) JOAN BELL et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald S.

Prager, Judge. Affirmed.

Suppa, Trucchi & Henein, Samy Henein and Raymond Lee for Defendants and

Appellants.

Wicks Law, Rory Richard Wicks; Veta & Veta and Ross E. Veta for Plaintiffs and

Respondents.

In 2011, John and Denise Lane (together the Lanes) filed a lawsuit (the property

action) against Denise's mother, Joan Bell. Bell's cross-complaint in the property action

alleged, among other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.