James H. Tripp v. United States

Good Law
381 F.2d 320
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 196720525California478 words

Opinion

Opinion

Browning, J.

Appellant James H. Tripp was convicted on twenty-two counts of a twenty-six count indictment charging violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 871, and 1010 (1964). The government alleged that Tripp and an unindicted individual engaged in a conspiracy to defraud the Federal Housing Administration, and that Tripp submitted false documents to the FHA designed to influence it to accept and guarantee loans and mortgages on Tripp-constructed houses.

The government based a separate count on each false document even where several of the documents were submitted in support of a single application. Of course such counts were not “duplicitous,” as appellant urged, for duplicity is the charging of several separate offenses in a single count. It is rarely prejudicial. More to the point, such counts did not split a single statutory offense into multiple charges, for under 18 U.S.C. § 1010 (1964) “[t]he filing of each false document would constitute a crime.” Bins v. United States, 331 F.2d 390, 393 (5th Cir. 1964). Cf. United States v. Private Brands, Inc., 250 F.2d 554, 557 (2d Cir. 1957).

Counts Four and Twenty-four, each alleging that appellant made, uttered, and published a document containing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.