Hyundai Securities Co. v. Ik Chi Lee

Good Law
182 Cal. Rptr. 3d 264·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 23·232 Cal. App. 4th 1379
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 2015B257276California4,746 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

We hold that under California’s Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1713-1724; the Act), a trial court may recognize (i) a foreign judgment for indemnification of a criminal penalty paid by plaintiff to an agency of the foreign government and (ii) a 20 percent postjudgment interest rate on a foreign judgment, as provided by the law of the foreign state; but the trial court, in recognizing a foreign judgment, may not enter a California judgment imposing postjudgment interest on the California judgment at a rate greater than 10 percent as provided by California law. Thus, we affirm the trial court’s judgment recognizing the foreign judgment, but reverse the imposition of a 20 percent postjudgment rate of interest on the California judgment recognizing the foreign judgment.

BACKGROUND

Defendant and appellant Ik Chi Lee (Lee) was the chief executive officer of plaintiff Hyundai Securities Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), from 1996 to 2000. Several individual shareholders of Hyundai brought in Korea a shareholders’ derivative action in the Seoul Southern District Court against Lee, as an officer of Hyundai, for, among other things,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.