People v. Springs CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 2015H040345California1,022 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

Filed 1/13/15 P. v. Springs CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H040345

(Monterey County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. Nos. SS041402, SS131327)

v.

TYROL SPRINGS,

Defendant and Appellant.

In 2011, the Legislature enacted the Criminal Justice Realignment Act (Stats. 2011, 1st Ex. Sess. 2011-2012, ch. 12, § 1; Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (h))1 (the Realignment Act or the Act). Under the Act, certain low-level felony offenders are no longer required to serve their sentences in state prison; instead, they must serve their sentences either entirely in county jail or partly in county jail and partly under the mandatory supervision of the county probation officer. (People v. Scott (2014) 58 Cal.4th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.