Chapman
Chapman v. City of Palmdale CA2/2
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/13/15 Chapman v. City of Palmdale CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
WAYNE CHAPMAN et al., B251913 (c/w B254125) Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. BC502011)
CITY OF PALMDALE et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Mark V. Mooney, Judge. Affirmed.
Geoffrey M. Faust for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak and William Litvak for Defendants and Respondents.
______________________________ Plaintiffs and appellants Wayne and Cheryl Chapman challenge a trial court order granting defendants and respondents City of Palmdale, Richard Kite, Susan Koleda, and Stacey…