Santiago, Rodnunsky & Jones v. Spahl CA2/2
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/14/15 Santiago, Rodnunsky & Jones v. Spahl CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
SANTIAGO, RODNUNSKY & JONES, B254488
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC096375) v.
STEVEN SPAHL et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Huey P. Cotton, Judge. Affirmed.
Law Offices of G. Marshall Hann and G. Marshall Hann for Defendants and Appellants.
Benedon & Serlin, Douglas G. Benedon and Wendy S. Albers for Plaintiff and Respondent. Steven Spahl and Donny Spahl (appellants) appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent Santiago, Rodnunsky & Jones (respondent) entered after respondent, who was the plaintiff in the trial…