Burdick

Burdick v. Superior Court

Good Law
183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 32·233 Cal. App. 4th 8·43 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1137
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 2015G049107California8,068 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

Introduction

In this writ proceeding, we address whether, in a lawsuit for defamation, a nonresident defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in California on the ground that, while in his or her state of residence, the defendant posted (and removed) allegedly defamatory statements about the plaintiff on the defendant’s publicly available Facebook page.

We hold that posting defamatory statements about a person on a Facebook page, while knowing that person resides in the forum state, is insufficient in itself to create the minimum contacts necessary to support specific personal jurisdiction in a lawsuit arising out of that posting. Instead, it is necessary that the nonresident defendant not only intentionally post the statements on the Facebook page, but that the defendant expressly aim or specifically direct his or her intentional conduct at the forum, rather than at a plaintiff who lives there. We emphasize the exercise of personal jurisdiction must be based upon forum-related acts that were personally committed by the nonresident defendant, not upon the plaintiff’s contacts with the forum or acts committed by codefendants or third parties.

The plaintiffs in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.