James Earl Preuit v. United States

Good Law
382 F.2d 277·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5333
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 196721545_1California575 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pope, J.

Preuit was a real estate broker in the business of selling residential property. Some of the parcels which he had for sale were rather undesirable and he had difficulty in finding buyers. The purchasers here in question were financed through the Federal Housing Administration. In order to procure homes for such purchasers it was necessary to disclose that the purchaser furnished cash for the purchase price equivalent to three percent of the amount of the loan from the bank which acted as agent for the FHA. Preuit anticipated collecting a five percent commission on the sale. In order to make sure that the sale could be completed, Preuit himself advanced the three percent required which the purchasers involved here did not have. At the same time Preuit would take a note from the seller for that amount.

In the cases of the sales here involved, represented by different counts of the indictment, appropriate forms were furnished to the bank disclosing that the purchaser in each case had paid the three percent or more in cash. Thus in one case, where the purchaser was one Kilburn N. McCoy, the application form furnished to FHA showed that the purchaser had paid in cash the sum of $400.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.