People v. Rabbitt CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 2015C073974California594 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/15/15 P. v. Rabbitt CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yuba) ----

THE PEOPLE, C073974

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF11692)

v.

THOMAS CECIL RABBITT II,

Defendant and Appellant.

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On December 16, 2011, defendant Thomas Cecil Rabbitt possessed 3 grams of methamphetamine for personal use. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) He pleaded no contest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.