Haddada
Haddada v. San Diego Financial Services CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Appellants Nadia Haddada and Osama A. Alkasabi filed this action against San
Diego Financial Services, Inc. (SDFS) and numerous other defendants after SDFS
acquired real property previously owned by appellants (the Property) at a trustee's sale.
Appellants' complaint contained three claims against SDFS – to quiet title to the
Property, to set aside the trustee's sale, and to void or cancel the trustee's deed upon sale.
SDFS filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion for
summary judgment and entered judgment in favor of SDFS.
On appeal, appellants have filed a materially deficient opening brief. Most
fundamentally, appellants' brief fails to comply with California Rules of Court, rule
8.204(a)(1)(C), which requires that each brief must "[s]upport any reference to a matter in
the record by a citation to the volume and page number of the record where the matter
appears." The statement of facts in appellants' brief fails to properly cite to any evidence
in the record relevant to this court's consideration of the trial court's order granting