Kilker

Kilker v. Stillman

Good Law
182 Cal. Rptr. 3d 712·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 42·233 Cal. App. 4th 320
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 2015G048473California4,226 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

INTRODUCTION

Following the entry of a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Terence A. Kilker and Paula J. Kilker (the Kilkers) and against defendant Frank C. Stillman, the trial court ordered Stillman to produce documents regarding his assets to the Kilkers. After Stillman failed to comply with that order, the trial court found Stillman in contempt and ordered, inter alla, that Stillman pay the Kilkers reasonable attorney fees and costs, plus interest. The underlying judgment was eventually satisfied.

To collect on the attorney fees and costs award, the Kilkers served a writ of execution on Preferred Bank to levy funds in Stillman’s bank account. Stillman submitted a claim of exemption to the writ. He asserted the funds in the account were Social Security payments exempt from levy under 42 United States Code section 407 . The Kilkers opposed Stillman’s claim of exemption, arguing that under Code of Civil Procedure section 704.080, only Social Security funds directly deposited into a bank account by the government are protected by the exemption. (All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.) The trial court found Stillman’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.