People v. Demarco CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 2015B258436California248 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 1/20/15 P. v. Demarco CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B258436 (Super. Ct. No. 14C-23998) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

DAVID VINCENT DEMARCO,

Defendant and Appellant.

David Vincent Demarco appeals from the judgment after he pled no contest to possession of methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) The trial court granted Proposition 36 probation (Pen. Code, § 1210.1) and ordered appellant to serve 64 days county jail and pay $1,300 in fines. We appointed counsel to represent appellant on appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed a brief raising no issues. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.