United States v. Jose Cabada

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 201511-10227California274 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 20 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10227

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00562-EJG-6

v.

ORDER

JOSE ANTONIO OJEDA CABADA,

Defendant - Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10262

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00562-EJG-9

v.

JOSE GONZALEZ ARIAS, AKA Cesar Castro Favela,

Defendant - Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10328

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00562-EJG-12

v.

JESUS ALFONZO BARRAZA

BARRAZA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Before: NOONAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and DANIEL, Senior District Judge.*

The panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing in United States v.

Barraza Barraza. Judge Ikuta votes to deny petitions for rehearing en banc in

United States v. Cabada and United States v. Barraza Barraza. Judge Noonan and

Judge Daniel recommend denying the petitions for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc, and no

judge of the court has requested a vote on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.