Cruise

Cruise v. Kroger Co.

Good Law
183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 17·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 44·233 Cal. App. 4th 390·39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1165
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 2015B248430ACalifornia3,712 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

— Defendants and appellants Kroger Co., Kroger Manufacturing, Compton Creamery, Keith Oldenkamp, Steve Kuebbing, Jesse Turner, Keith Henry, Jill McIntosh and Tony Ramirez (sometimes collectively referred to as Kroger or the Kroger defendants) appeal an order denying their motion to compel arbitration of an employment discrimination action filed by plaintiff and respondent Stephanie Cruise (Cruise).

At the time Cruise applied for employment with Kroger in 2007, she completed an employment application which contained an arbitration clause requiring arbitration of employment-related disputes. The employment application also incorporated by reference Kroger’s mediation and binding arbitration policy (Arbitration Policy or Policy).

The trial court denied Kroger’s motion to compel arbitration, ruling that Kroger failed to meet its burden to prove the existence of an arbitration agreement. The trial court was not persuaded the undated four-page arbitration policy attached to Kroger’s moving papers was extant at the time Cruise read and signed the employment application, and that it was the same Arbitration Policy to which the employment application referred.

We conclude the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.