Trejo

Trejo v. Arriaga CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2015D064410California2,825 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/21/15 Trejo v. Arriaga CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MARCO A. TREJO, D064410

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. ECU03552)

LUIS M. ARRIAGA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Imperial County,

Juan Ulloa, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Francisco Javier Aldana and Francisco J. Aldana for Plaintiff and

Appellant.

Walker & Driskill, Steven M. Walker, Mitchell A. Driskill, and Martin A.

Gonzalez for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant Marco A. Trejo appeals a judgment granting nonsuit to

defendant and respondent Luis M. Arriaga. Trejo contends the court erred by finding insufficient evidence was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.