Popescu

Popescu v. Kennedy CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2015D064883California2,662 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

Filed 1/21/15 Popescu v. Kennedy CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

VIRGIL POPESCU, D064883

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00061982-

CU-PT-CTL)

JOHN KENNEDY,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Sharon B.

Majors-Lewis and Jeffrey F. Fraser, Judges. Affirmed.

Virgil Popescu, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John Kennedy, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent.

Virgil Popescu appeals from an order of the superior court denying a civil

harassment restraining order and dissolving a temporary restraining order against John

Kennedy. On appeal, Popescu contends the trial court erred in denying both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.