Lim

Lim v. Pak CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2015B255771California2,380 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/21/15 Lim v. Pak CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

BRADFORD LIM, B255771

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC503182) v.

KYUNG W. PAK et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Ruth Ann Kwan, Judge. Affirmed.

Bradford Lim, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Kim, Park, Choi & Yi, Tony K. Kim and Michael Y. Yi for Defendants and

Respondents.

_______________________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Bradford Lim appeals from the judgment of dismissal after the court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants and respondents Kyung W. Pak1 and Peter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.