Coblentz, Patch v. City & Co. of S.F.
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2015A135509California6,343 words
Opinion
Opinion
Jenkins, J.
Filed 1/9/15 (unmodified opn. attached; pub. order 1/22/15 [see end of opn.])
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS,
LLP,
Plaintiff and Appellant, A135509
v. (City & County of San Francisco CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Super. Ct. No. CGC-11-514292) FRANCISCO et al.,
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
Defendants and Respondents. AND DENYING REHEARING
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
BY THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed on December 24, 2014, is modified as follows:
(1) On page 13, delete first sentence, and substitute the following sentence:
Although Proposition Q does not define “return on capital investment,” in its common understanding and as pertinent here, the phrase refers to a partnership’s distributions related to capital contributions made by a partner. (Corp. Code, § 16401(a)(1)(2) 10.)
(2) On page 14, line 14 of the second full paragraph, replace the word “underling” with the word “underlining.”