Harb

Harb v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 59·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 64·233 Cal. App. 4th 606
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2015F066839California3,589 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

— Mohamad Harb, M.D., was driving home from his shift at Kern Medical Center’s neonatal intensive care unit when he suffered a stroke and drove his car onto a sidewalk. The police officer who arrived at the scene did not call an ambulance immediately because she deduced from Dr. Harb’s vomiting, slurred speech and disorientation that he was intoxicated and, after a struggle, placed him in handcuffs. The first ambulance that arrived on the scene left without Dr. Harb. Later, a second ambulance took Dr. Harb to a hospital where he received treatment and survived, but the brain damage he suffered rendered him unable to care for himself.

Harb and his wife sued the City of Bakersfield (City), the responding officer, the ambulance company, and the paramedic who drove the first ambulance. They alleged defendants’ delay in getting Harb medical treatment made the consequences of his stroke much worse. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a defense verdict. Plaintiffs appealed, contending the jury instructions contained two errors.

First, plaintiffs argue a police immunity instruction (an officer is not liable if exercising due care) should not have been given because it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.