Vargas

Vargas v. FMI, Inc.

Good Law
182 Cal. Rptr. 3d 803·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 60·233 Cal. App. 4th 638·80 Cal. Comp. Cases 111
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2015B246660California10,994 words

Opinion

Opinion

Edmon, J.

— Jose Vargas (Vargas or plaintiff) and Luis Felipe Villalobos (Villalobos) were a two-man team driving a tractor-trailer across the country. Villalobos was driving and Vargas was in the sleeper berth when the tractor-trailer rolled over, injuring Vargas. Vargas sued FMI, Inc. (FMI) (the motor carrier and trailer owner), Eves Express, Inc. (Eves) (the tractor owner), Eswin Suchite (Suchite) (Eves’s principal), and Villalobos (the driver), for negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment for FMI and Eves, concluding as a matter of law that neither was vicariously liable for Villalobos’s alleged negligence.

Vargas appeals, contending that (1) as a federally licensed motor carrier, FMI owed him a nondelegable duty of care and is vicariously liable for Villalobos’s negligence, and (2) Eves is vicariously liable for Villalobos’s negligence under Vehicle Code section 17150 (vehicle owner is liable for negligence of permissive user). FMI and Eves respond that (1) under Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689 [ 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 72 , 854 P.2d 721 ] (Privette), a hirer (FMI) is not vicariously liable for the negligence of a person (Villalobos) hired by an independent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.